All documents from essays.org are for research assistance purpose only. Do not present the material as your own work!
bookmark & share the essay...
PAUGH VERSUS CITY OF SEATTLE
This paper is on law where it has discussed the case of paugh versus city of seattle.
It states that the owner of the land does not owe any duty to the trespassers except in a situation where he or she causes injury deliberately.
|language || ||english
|wordcount || ||373 (cca 1 pages)
|contextual quality || ||N/A
|language level || ||N/A
|price || ||free
|sources || ||1
Table of contents
Preview of the essay: PAUGH VERSUS CITY OF SEATTLE
PAUGH V. CITY OF SEATTLE The legal rule and reasoning in Washington is that the owner of the land does not owe any duty to the trespassers except in ...
... security of young children who are not protected under the general rule that governs the legal responsibility of the owners of the land against trespassers.
Essay is in categories