pick category
All documents from essays.org are for research assistance purpose only. Do not present the material as your own work!
bookmark & share the essay...
All /
... and integration of global statutes. The recent spite of terrorism and crimes is making the nations not to guarantee their own sovereignty since they have to rely on the global partners and in essence erode one’s independence. On the other hand, it may not be true that globalization is leading to the demise of states because states have continued to play a significant role in the process from legitimization to political and financial influence. Neo-liberalist fails to factor the transformations that have taken place in the global world without realizing that it’s the state which is behind all the developments in the global arena. This perception of a meaningless state may not be forth coming since states continue to play a crucial role in shaping the globe. They will therefore remain to be instrumental in the face of rising globalization. In nutshell, it’s not true that states will be meaningless in this dispensation of globalization.
GLOBALIZATION IS RENDERING THE STATE MEANINGLESS
Globalization from point of view of Neo-Realism and Neo- Liberalism
Details
| language |  | english |
| wordcount |  | 5104 (cca 14 pages) |
| contextual quality |  | N/A |
| language level |  | N/A |
| price |  | free |
| sources |  | 15 |
Table of contents
1. Introduction
2. A glimpse at Neo-liberalism
3. Neo-Realism and Neo- Liberalism debate
4. Neo-liberalism and Globalization: Sovereignty of State
5. Arguments against the thesis statement
6. Conclusion
7. Bibliography
Preview of the essay: GLOBALIZATION IS RENDERING THE STATE MEANINGLESS
The rise of globalization has led into a new thinking on the sovereignty of the state in a virtually borderless world. The neo-liberalists argue that the extent of globalization has made the governments defunct and empowered a new breed of economic and political giants. To them, governments have ceased to be instrumental in exerting influence on the patterns of international issues especially capital which has become placeless. This paper looks at the argument that the rising globalization is rendering the states meaningless. Comparison and contrast of the views from the neo-liberal school of thought and that from the neo-realism school are analyzed. An in-depth analysis of the literature from various backgrounds helps to arrive at the conclusion on the position of the state in the face of globalization. Both arguments highlight the dynamic transformations ...... and integration of global statutes. The recent spite of terrorism and crimes is making the nations not to guarantee their own sovereignty since they have to rely on the global partners and in essence erode one’s independence. On the other hand, it may not be true that globalization is leading to the demise of states because states have continued to play a significant role in the process from legitimization to political and financial influence. Neo-liberalist fails to factor the transformations that have taken place in the global world without realizing that it’s the state which is behind all the developments in the global arena. This perception of a meaningless state may not be forth coming since states continue to play a crucial role in shaping the globe. They will therefore remain to be instrumental in the face of rising globalization. In nutshell, it’s not true that states will be meaningless in this dispensation of globalization.
Essay is in categories
/
Humanistic Studies
/Politology
/International Relations
//
Economics
/International Business
/Comments
none